In renewing local law number one, councillors adopted clause 2.26, which provides the chief executive officer with the opportunity to provide public comment on any unreasonable criticism that is directed at the council officers

during a meeting.

Council's director of corporate services Chris Cowley defined unreasonable as "going beyond accepted or reasonable limits", and unfounded as "not supported by evidence or facts".

"The chairperson ultimately decides if the criticism is unreasonable," he said.

Under section 91 of the Local Government Act 1989, the council is required to make a local law to govern the conduct of its meetings. The council's current local law number one meets this requirement.

Councillors are allowed criticism, but can call "points of order" which is stated in clause 2.19. Mr Cowley said when "points of order" were raised, it must be considered by the chairperson.

"A point of order would typically be called when a councillor believes the local law in not being adhered to," he said. "For example in clause 2.11(6) the local law number one provides that members of the public must extend due

courtesy and respect to the council and must take direction from the chairperson.

"If this does not occur, a councillor may call a point of order. Once a point of order is call the chairperson will decide the appropriate course of action."

Mr Cowley said infringement notices could be issued under the clause.