News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Daylesford bushfire response meeting a fizzer 

Daylesford bushfire response meeting a fizzer

10 Aug, 2010 12:59 PM
A KEY bushfire meeting in Daylesford has drawn a disappointing turnout.

Only about 50 people gathered for the meeting at the Daylesford Inn on Saturday afternoon, where residents were given the opportunity to help shape the government's final response to the Royal Commission recommendations.

Residents were disappointed with the state government's poor notification and poor involvement of the community in the meeting.

The shire's most recent bushfire was on February 23, 2009 - two weeks after the Black Saturday bushfires, where 2658ha were burnt at Musk Vale.

Hepburn Shire councillor Bill McClenaghan said Saturday's meeting was "hurriedly called".

"Unfortunately, a lot more people did not attend. Clearly those in the know were here," he said.

Daylesford resident Warren Maloney, a Rotary representative on the community fire committee, said while the meeting allowed those who attended to express their personal views, for a "community meeting" it was a limited forum.

"It was extremely disappointing that a number of senior officers of the council were not present," he said.

"I would not like to think that because it's the weekend or they have greater priorities that they wouldn't attend a bushfire consultation."

Community facilitator on behalf of the state government, Rob Masters, apologised for the meeting's short notice, which was called early last week.

"The Premier wants to get the final responses to the final recommendations out as soon as possible," he said.

"The state government, in its interim response, has already announced in-principle support for 59 of the commission's 67 recommendations.

"The remaining eight require further consultation with the community and agencies, and we are meeting with communities across Victoria to listen to their thoughts on these and all of the recommendations in the report."

During the two-hour meeting, residents discussed refuges, forced evacuations, powerlines, acquisition of property, fuel reduction and local government response.

Among the unanswered questions residents had was what to do on high-risk fire days, when local government facilities would be closed.

"Who is going to take responsibility for contacting people, locating people," one resident said.

Other topics of discussion included where people would evacuate to, how to communicate fire plans with tourists and the need to clean up and burn off "fire traps" around the shire.

Cr McClenaghan said there had been some very good ideas raised.

"We all look forward now to where our ideas end up and what the government is going to do with them," he said.

Creswick, Daylesford, Hepburn Springs and Trentham were listed among the 52 at-risk towns.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If they wanted people to come they would not have scheduled it for 2pm on a sat arvo when 1/2 the locals are working and the other 1/2 are at the football / netball.
Posted by footy fan, 10/08/2010 3:14:20 PM, on The Advocate (Hepburn)

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Advocate







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...